Streamlining the Process to Split Your Mind Image Source

I believe that the continuous string of multiple murder-suicides in this country that is on the rise at an alarming rate, may have an underline cause that is related to double bind messages. We know that double bind messages have a high correlation as a causative factor for Schizophrenia in families.
In this country we have been bombarded by Fascist styled propaganda from all network TV stations in an attempt to "normalize" the fact that we have Fascists in the executive branch of our government! Our government is running out of control and destroying our country but the media acts like every thing is "Honky Dory" as long as they are getting rich.  I will go into this in more depth in a future article.

For this article I am presenting another view point from an investigative journalist  that I consider to be a Foreign Correspondent for LA MFT Janet Phelan.

The recent Colorado shootings have raised concerns as to the possibility that James Holmes may be the latest in a series of Manchurian candidate-type experiments. The techniques to create a person acting unconsciously under the orders of others have been greatly streamlined in recent years.

The MK ULTRA programs intended to create the “perfect spy,” according to many pundits. MK ULTRA was purportedly abandoned in the late 1970s after the Church hearings, when the widespread nature of these human experimentation programs was brought to Congressional attention. Many of the programs, as revealed during these hearings, utilized drugs and other chemical agents.

The 1996 publication of the book, The Illuminati Formula to Create an
 Undetectable Mind Controlled Slave, by Fritz  Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler, reawakened widespread concerns that the MK ULTRA programs had not been terminated. The book detailed a system of trauma-based mind control, harkening back to the human experiments done in Nazi Germany as the genesis for the recent efforts to create a crop of “mind controlled slaves.” The book became a cult sensation and in his introduction to the book, Springmeier  alleged there were over 40,000 such “mind-controlled” individuals within the borders of the United States.

The process described by Wheeler and Springmeier, however, is unwieldy and involves abductions which may be difficult to cover up. Similarly, prior indications of therapist and psychiatrist involvement in creating mind-controlled subjects also necessitates a time-consuming programming process. Recent revelations indicate the process of creating a “pocket” in the mind-- wherein certain preprogrammed  behaviors may lie  dormant until awakened-- may have been streamlined to an extent where the process itself is virtually undetectable.

Much of the available literature on mind control discusses the creation of
“multiple” or “split” personalities, wherein one personality is unaware of what the other is doing. In terms of the process discussed here, wherein a suggestion is implanted while a person has gone under the influence of a drug, this reporter prefers to use the term “pocket,” due to the fact that what is being created is not an entire, separate personality or “alter” but rather a pre-programmed response to a particular stimuli or trigger.

Given the current state of the technology which may create such a “pocket” in a person’s mind, considering the following scenario:
A preselected target is invited to the movies by a man she may have known for weeks,or even months. He offers to go get the drinks and popcorn and slips into her soda the drug of choice for such a project, likely a chemical in the same class as rophenol. The unsuspecting target drinks her soda and “falls asleep.”

Parenthetically, there is at least one documented case of a zealous District Attorney drugging a prospective witness with sodium pentothal and then guiding him through his testimony. When Jim Garrison had Clay Shaw in his sights as a prospective candidate for prosecution for the assassination of JFK, he dosed his star witness, Perry Raymond Russo, with  sodium pentothal in order to secure an agreeable testimony. Up to that point, Russo had denied any knowledge of an assassination conspiracy involving Shaw.

 (Source)

Back to our lady at the theatre. The agent takes from his pocket a small
 recorder, on which is recorded the commands as well as the pre-designated signal. The signal may be a particular word, or more likely, a series of electronic noises. He fits an earpiece into the slumbering woman and while the movie plays, so does the tape. At the end of the programming session, he removes the earpiece and sticks the recorder back in his pocket.

After about two hours, she awakens, a bit embarrassed that she fell asleep on the date. He slyly debriefs her: “Do you remember ANYTHING?” he asks and she sheepishly tells him what he needs to hear--if any of this seeped into her conscious recall. They then go out to dinner.

Sometime  in the future, the phone rings in the middle of the night. She rolls over to pick it up and the triggering sound is relayed to her over the phone lines. The pocket created in her mind at the programming session opens up and she arises from her bed  and, in a similar manner to a person acting out a post- hypnotic suggestion, does just as she was told.

No informed consent and a virtually undetectable process such as this may have produced an untold number of such individuals, who would have no idea they had been accessed in this manner. What is apparent by the actions of Holmes, Chapman, Sirhan, as well as many others who have been charged with horrific and very public crimes, is that their subsequent behavior has been peculiarly passive and disassociated. They appear dazed and report no memory of what they have done. In fact, the results of the infamous Milgram "Obedience to Authority" experiments and, more recently, the French Fake TV Torture experiments have indicated that for many people it is not even necessary to be under the influence of a drug or a trance-state in order to commit murderous and inhumane acts towards other people.
All that is necessary is that a person in authority give the order. One of the
aspects of being human appears to be a general accommodation to the orders of others.

It’s a brave new world, folks. Very little is as it appears to be in our post-9/11 America, and the abuse of unsuspecting individuals has become an epidemic. The revelations of how easy it is to create a perfect patsy or fall guy might just keep some of us awake at night. Let’s just hope the phone doesn’t ring.

Janet Phelan
Activist Post

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/09/streamlining-process-to-split-your-mind.html

California – Psych Board Blasted By Judge

“Return to Practice OK’d” for Activist Psychologist “We all need to be concerned when psychiatry is used as a weapon rather than as a tool for mental health.”  By Janet Phelan In a startling reversal of fortune, a Sacramento Superior Court judge ruled last Friday to stay the revocation of activist psychologist Dr. Robert Fettgather’s license to practice psychology. Dr. Fettgather’s license had been ordered revoked in May after he refused to submit to a psychiatric examination ordered by the California State Psychology Board. The revocation was set to come into force on July 27. The stay grants Dr. Fettgather permission to work as a licensed psychologist until the writ requesting the Board’s decision be entirely overturned can be heard. Blasting the Psychology Board for launching an action against Fettgather without justification, Sacramento Superior Court Judge Timothy Frawley declared that the Board lacked good cause to compel him into a psychiatric evaluation.  Judge Frawley also raised concerns that the Administrative Law court further denied Fettgather’s  right to due process in refusing to hear any evidence from Fettgather. According to Fettgather’s attorney, Dr. Bruce Ebert, Frawley also raised questions as to the cavalier manner in which the Psychology Board had attempted to force Fettgather into a psychiatric exam. In an interview July 30, Ebert stated, “If there was any part of government that should understand the seriousness of ordering someone to undergo a forced psychiatric exam it should be the Board which regulates the practice of psychology.” Ebert went on to say, “We all need to be concerned when psychiatry is used as a weapon rather than as a tool for mental health.” Fettgather had run into difficulties last year when his advocacy for his disabled son, David, who is under a conservatorship and held in custodial care, raised the ire of a State Assemblyman. Dr. Fettgather had spoken at a Town Hall meeting and criticized Assemblyman Jim Beall for failure to follow through on the plight of David. Assemblyman Beall then made a report to the Dignitaries Protection Unit of the California Highway Patrol, alleging that Fettgather had threatened him. The report was investigated and considered to be of no merit, according to the CHP. However, shortly thereafter the State Psychology Board contacted Dr. Fettgather and stated that they were investigating him Fettgather has a long history of advocacy for the disabled and mentally ill, going back to the 1970’s. Housed in the Department of Consumer Affairs, the State Psychology Board is mandated to investigate consumer complaints.  However, there were no consumer complaints made against Dr. Fettgather and the Board proceeded with complaints tendered by former employees of Dr. Fettgather who were apparently disgruntled at the termination of their employment. Ebert has called this a victory not only for Dr. Fettgather but also for the Constitution.  Ebert, who has a PhD in psychology and is a four- term former president of the State Psychology Board, said “Dr. Fettgather is a good man and a good psychologist.” Russ Heimerich, the spokesperson for the Department of Consumer Affairs, issued a terse “no comment.” The press office  for the California Department of Justice, which prosecuted this matter, claimed that the AG was only representing its client—the Psychology Board– according to the client’s wishes. The California Medical Board was contacted for comment on allegations that this Board has also issued an Administrative subpoena for Dr. Ebert to be psychologically evaluated. Laura Sweet, who allegedly signed the subpoena, has declined to comment, citing privacy laws. For more information on this story, please visit:  http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/05/14/california-state-psychology-board-launches-psychiatric-probe-of-activist-psychologist/

California State Psychology Board Launches Psychiatric Probe of Activist Psychologist

Monday, May 14, 2012 

The California State Psychology Board has launched an action against a Northern California psychologist and advocate for the disabled, and has ordered the practitioner into a psychiatric evaluation or face revocation of his license.

In an unprecedented deviation from the Board's mandate to investigate consumer complaints, the Board has involved itself in what appears to be an employer/employee dispute.

Psychology Board employee Gina Bayless refused to go on the record as to why the Board has taken such an unusual stance in the matter of Dr. Robert Fettgather. The State Psychology Board, which is housed in the State Department of Consumer Affairs, has placed on its website a legal document mandating Fettgather into the evaluation but omits any names of or details about his accusers.

This reporter has obtained the names of the four former employees of Dr. Fettgather who have filed complaints against him. Bayless refused to confirm or deny that these were the complainants due to what she called “privacy issues.”

Dr. Fettgather, who has been licensed to practice psychology in the State of California for 22 years without a complaint being lodged against him, came under scrutiny by the Board following a series of events surrounding his advocacy for his disabled son, David. David was born with Down Syndrome.

According to Fettgather, David was prompted by Herman Kothe, a caseworker at Alta Regional Center, to “scribble on the signature line (he cannot provide informed consent) and signed his life away into care home exile.”

His father refers to the warehousing of his son as “incarceration.” The Fettgathers had divorced many years ago and, up until the time that the mother moved from San Jose to Sacramento, were sharing custody of David. Around the time that David turned eighteen, he was placed by his mother into what Dr. Fettgather terms a “slum home.” Dr. Fettgather was erroneously informed by the Alta Regional center staff that David had to be conserved once he reached the age of eighteen. In fact, this is not the case in the State of California. According to the Director of Association of Regional Centers, Eileen Richey, there are very few DD adults under conservatorship in California and this generally takes place when the individual has no parents.

In an effort to comply with what he thought was a legal necessity and unable to work with his ex-wife on the issue of David’s care, Fettgather decided to look for a suitable guardian. Fettgather reports having interviewed Kay Carrigan and states he was satisfied that she was going to do the best for David. The last thing he expected was what followed.

Dr. Fettgather wanted his son to return to San Jose and live with him. Conservator Carrigan refused to permit this, and placed David into yet another home for the developmentally disabled. She then curtailed his education, removing him from the high school he had been successfully attending and putting him back into a segregated middle school. Fettgather reports his son began to decompensate.

As Fettgather's advocacy for his son continued, the conservator responded with further restrictions. She began to defame the father in the probate court and to limit his visits with his son.

In a letter dated 8/21/07 from Fettgather's attorney Betty Marshall to Carrigan's attorney, Fred Heise, Marshall alleges that Carrigan and Heise were “withholding information and conspiring to deprive David of Dr. Fettgathers legal mandated involvement in the IEP and IPP process for David.” State and Federal law mandate the IEP and IPP to protect the rights of the disabled.

Carrigan ultimately resigned and was replaced by conservator Betty Wright. Dr. Fettgather believes she resigned to avoid a possible lawsuit.

In the meantime, Fettgather became increasingly politically active around the issue of adult guardianship, which has become a “national nightmare,” according to elder advocate and activist Bonnie Reiter.

Reiter, who lost her mother, Corinne Bramson, to a conservator/hospice scam in Florida, has termed conservatorship a “holocaust on the elderly and disabled.” Fettgather began to join together with other conservatorship activists and set up a website, David Fettgather’s Circle of Support (friendsofdavidfettgather.blogspot.com).

He also started contacting his elected representatives concerning the abuses going on in David’s case. He filed, along with other conservatorship victims, a complaint with the State Attorney General. He also filed a complaint against the conservator with the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau (PFB) only to be advised that his sole remedy lay with the court. Jane Valdez, an erstwhile analyst with the PFB, which--along with the Psychology Board --is housed in the Department of Consumer Affairs, advised him of the closure in a telephone call and has refused to put this in writing.

The PFB got into hot water a couple of years back when it was determined that the agency was closing complaints and advising complainants that their remedy lay with the court. This is a departure from the mandate of that agency to investigate and prosecute conservator misconduct. The agency now appears to have adopted a policy of verbal notification of complaint closures and is reluctant to commit this type of questionable determination to writing. Recent revelations that the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau does not have a policies and procedures manual has raised alarm that the agency is in violation of the law in numerous aspects of its functioning.

Parenthetically, Fettgather's advocacy work spans several decades. In 1976, he first began advocating for those institutionalized in California State mental hospitals, which were considered by many to be the worst in the United States. Ultimately, the hospitals were shut down by Governor Ronald Reagan.

In 2008, Fettgather met with Assemblyman Jim Beall. When Beall failed to follow up on David's situation, Fettgather called him on it. Presenting at a Town Hall meeting in April of 2011, Fettgather told David's story and revealed that Beall had ignored his pleas. Beall was embarrassed. Following the meeting, Beall contacted the Dignitary Protection Section of the California Highway Patrol, alleging that Fettgather had “accosted” him.

The DPS investigator contacted the conservator and also at least one judge. Apparently at this juncture, a number of others in the conservatorship community were also notified. However, according to a press officer at the California Highway Patrol, the DPS investigator determined that no crime had occurred and that there was no threat.

Assemblyman Beall’s office replied to queries as to the nature of his complaint to the DPS and stated “Following the security protocols of the California Highway Patrol unit responsible for the safety of legislators, the Assembly District 24 office is precluded from commenting on any interactions Mr. Fettgather has had with authorities or Assemblymember Beall.” The Assemblyman’s office also stated that “Mr. Beall and his staff have brought Mr. Fettgather’s personal concerns regarding his son, as well as his allegations, to the attention of the Department of Developmental Services. Because of confidentiality regulations, the Assembly District 24 office is not allowed to share that information with you.”

Two days after the Town Hall meeting, Dr. Fettgather visited Alta Regional Center and asked to meet with David's caseworker.

A strong relationship exists between the regional centers and the conservators who take charge of the developmentally disabled. The RC’s work closely with the conservators as a team to locate services and vendors for the developmentally disabled.

Instead of meeting with a caseworker, Fettgather was taken into a private room by Alta Regional Center employee David Rydquist. Moments later, Executive Director Phil Bonnet joined them and began to level accusations against Dr. Fettgather. States Fettgather, “”Bonnet tried to provoke me at every turn....he made countless intimations about my mental status: are you going to kidnap your son; you've been acting pretty strangely...” According to Dr. Fettgather, Bonnet referenced the recent incident with Beall, stating he had already been informed about it.

Fettgather states that Bonnet manhandled him in an effort to forcibly escort him out of the building. Fettgather called the police and reported the assault. Fettgather's fiancée had accompanied him to the Alta RC and was reportedly badly shaken by the incident.

The police arrived and threatened Fettgather with arrest if he returned to Alta, stating he was “trespassing.”

Alta Regional Center Director Phil Bonnet did not return calls asking for his input on the incident with Dr. Fettgather.

A couple of days after this, Dr. Fettgather received a call from State Psychology Board investigator Jeremy Singleton who informed him there was a client complaint against him.

This soon morphed to a non-consumer complaint and ultimately he was told that four of his former employees had filed complaints against him. Also referenced is a complaint by a wife of a former patient. The wife was in treatment with one of the former employees.

Citing concerns about his mental status, the California State Psychology Board has ordered Fettgather into a psychiatric assessment. He has refused. The hearing is scheduled in Administrative Law court in Oakland on May 14.

At this juncture, Fettgather is permitted to see David every other weekend. Due to the length of the drive from San Jose to Sacramento, he has parked a houseboat in the Sacramento area for the weekend visits.

​”I have spent over 100,000 in court fighting for David,” he reports. He refuses to go back into probate court, stating it is pointless. “There is a cozy relationship between the judges and the professional conservators,” he states. “The conservator's attorney has stated that I am a 'legal stranger' to my son. They own him now.” Incidentally, Fettgather has been paying half the conservator's fees, half her attorney’s fees and half the fees of the attorney appointed by the court to represent David, splitting these bills with his ex-wife. He states that he stopped paying on these bills a few months back, dismayed by the lack of attention to David's well-being.

“David is very unhappy,” says Dr. Fettgather. “He wants to come home.”

Fettgather fears that the attempt to revoke his license to practice will, if successful, negatively impact his ability to advocate for his son.

A growing number of people who have attempted to advocate for a family member under a conservatorship have found themselves the target of retaliation. Dr. Robert Sarhan of Florida, who lost his mother to highly questionable medical decisions made by her conservator, also lost his medical license and narrowly escaped an effort by Social Services to take away his son. A number of people, including Marty Prehn and Russell East, have found the financial retaliation for their advocacy has resulted in their homelessness. Others, such as Ray Fernandez, have left the U.S. due to perceptions of extreme prejudice by the conservatorship courts. Robert Gettinger was arrested by a SWAT team in Southern California when his internet postings about corrupt probate judges raised the ire of the legal community. No charges were ever lodged and Gettinger, a former police officer, was released after a couple of days in jail.

Others, such as Ricky Ritch, claim that they were assaulted by the police due to their attempts to advocate against abusive conservatorships. Jeannie Tanaka, who is an attorney for the State of California, was subject to a false arrest when Conservator Linda Cotterman made a false police report and had Jeannie taken into custody during a routine visit with her mother. Jeannie was released prior to being booked when the Beverly Hills police realized that there was no Restraining Order in effect against her.

Several attorneys, known to those in the guardianship reform movement to be aggressive in pursuit of justice in matters involving conservatorship abuse, have been suspended from the practice of law. Arizona JD Grant Goodman and California JD Jim Reiss are two of the more recent legal casualties.

Those concerned about the increasing use of psychiatry as a tool of control by the State are asked to contact Gina Bayless at the State Psychology Board and lodge your concerns. The number for the Board is 916 263-2699. Press 0 to be connected to the receptionist.

*****************************************************************************

At the time of going to press, this reporter was informed that the document filed by the State Psychology Board describing its concerns about Dr. Fettgather was only served on his attorney May 10, a mere four days before his hearing. This document, prepared by clinical psychologist Francis Abueg, was submitted to the Department of Justice on August 3, 2011, nine months before the hearing, and appears to contain a number of inaccuracies, including the allegation that Fettgather never met with Dr. Abueg. In fact, Fettgather and his attorney, Dr. Bruce Ebert, met with Abueg for two hours per Abueg’s request.

A local attorney, speaking on conditions of anonymity, has expressed the concern that such withholding of the specific allegations against Fettgather and only releasing them to his legal team at the eleventh hour might violate his right to due process.

Monday, May 14, 2012

Janet C. Phelan

Activist Post

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/05/california-state-psychology-board.html